COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE v. ABHI CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. FEBRUARY 21, 2005 (S.N. VARIA VA, DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN AND S.H. KAPADrA, JJ.] Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Tariff Headings 23.02 and 29.36; Trade Notice No.3411990/Policy Circular No.9911997 issued by Central Board of C Excise and Customs :
Classification-Recovit and Daily Mix-Levy of exCise duty under Tariff Headings 23.02 or 29.36-Held: Chemical test report reveals that the product in question is a mixture df vitamins and oxidants etc., thus cannot be called as only intermixture of vitamins classifiable under Tariff Heading 29.36- D Issuance of Circular by the Board clarifying that a product like the product in question would fall under Tariff Heading 23. 02 provided it is used exclusively as animal feed supplements-In a similar matter Supreme Court held the product in question as animal feed supplement-Hence, the product classifiable under Tariff Heading 23.02.
The question which arose for determination in this appeal was as to whether the product Dailymix/Recovit is classifiable under Tariff Heading 23.09 as animal feeding as claimed by the Assessee-manufacturer or under Tariff Heading 29.36 as intermixture of vitamins as classified by the Revenue for the purpose of levy of excise duty.
It was contended for the appellant-Revenue that both the Commissioner (Appeals) and the CEGA T have totally ignored the chemical test report in respect of the product in question to determine its classifiability; that the product in question should be treated as animal feed supplement containing vitamins and minerals; that both the G Commissioner (Appeals) and the CEGAT have erred in placing total reliance on the judgment in the case of Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd.*; since the product in that case consists of a mixture of vitamins, minerals and various other ingredients classifiable under Chapter Sub-heading 2936.00 but the product in question consists of only intermixture of vitamins. ' —
C.C.E. r. ABHI CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.LTD. Assessee submitted that since the classification list classifying the A products under Tariff Heading 23.02 has been approved by the Revenue Authorities, they are not allowed to change their own decision later on; that the product in question was used as animal feed only and as such classifiable under Tariff heading 23.02; that the product basically consists of mixture of vitamins, minerals, anti-oxidants and stabilisers and thus the Revenue has wrongly classified the product Ui1der Chapter 29 as intermixture of vitamins.
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD : 1.1. The products in question which have mixture of C vitamins and minerals with addition of other ingredients and which are used for animal feed are not fit for human consumption. Hence, they should be classified as animal feed supplement under Chapter Heading 2302 and not under Chapter 29. (215-A)
1.2. The Central Board of Excise and Customs issued a Circular r:;> clarifying that when premix contains in addition to active substances, stabilizers, anti-oxidants etc. and if such preparations are of a kind used in animal feeding the same is classifiable under Heading 23.02. Similarly, the Dy. Director General of Foreign Trade vide its policy Circular No.44 has re-confirmed that if such pre-mixes are for use exclusively for animal E feed as supplements, the same continued to be classified under Heading 23.09 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. (216-G; 219-A-Bl
1.3. The Chemical test memo revealed that the product Recovit had in addition to the intermixture of vitamins other ingredients such as anti- oxidants, solvents and stabilisers and that the product prepared cannot, F therefore, be called as only intermixture of vitamins. (219-G-H) 2. A larger Bench of the CEGAT in the case of Tetragon Chemie (P) ltd. and Ors. v. CCE, Bangalore and Ors., (1999) 82 ECR 98 has laid down the principle and also the classification in regard to the subject-matter of controversy. This Court upheld the view taken by the Tribunal and held G that the products in question are animal feed supplements, thus they were rightly included in Tariff Item 23.02 being preparation of a kind used in animal feeding; and that even food supplements which are used in animal feeding would fall under Heading 23.02. (222-E-Fl
(2005] 2 S.C.R. Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore v. Tetragon Chemie (P) ltd. (2001) 132 E.L.T. 525, relied on. Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. and Ors. v. CCE, Bangalore and Ors., (1999) 82 ECR 98, approved.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 5646of1999. From the Judgment and Order dated 11.3 .99 of the Central Excise, Customs and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in F.O. ~o. 243/ 99-D in A. No. E/2546 of 1993-D.
R. Venkataramani, A. Subba Rao, Ashok Panigrahi, G. Umapathy, S. Gowtham, .P. Parmeswaran and B. Krishna Prasad for the Appellant. . Makarand D. Adkar, S.D. Singh, Vijay Kumar and Vishwajit Singh for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, J.This civil appeal is directed against the judgment and final order No. 243/99-D in Appeal No. E/2546/93-D dated 11.03.1999 passed by the. Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate E Tribunal (for short 'the CEGA T') at New Delhi.
The respondent is the manufacturer of Dailymix. Four show cause notices were issued alleging that they had mis-classified their products unde.~ C.S.H. No. 2302.00 and cleared at nil rate of duty. The show cause notices added that these products are intermixture of vitamins and, therefore, correctly p classifiable.under C.S.H. No. 2936.00 and as such chargeable to duty at the rate of 15% advance (BED) + 5% BED (SEO).
The Assistant Commissioner in his order dated 24.01.1991 held that the products Dailymix and Briplex were correctly classifiable under Chapter Sub- heading 2302.00. He, however, confirmed the demand of Rs.2,04,129.18. In G respect of 'RECOVIT'with which we are concerned in this appeal, he held that it is classifiable under Chapter Sub-heading 2936.00 as animal feed supplement. The conclusion of the Assistant Commissioner was arrived at on the basis of Dy. Chief Chemist's report which stated that Recovit may be· considered as an organic chemical (intermixture of vitamins) marked as H Annexure-P2. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) C.C. E. v. ABHI CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. [LAKSHMANAN, J] 213 who, by his order dated 27.07.1993, set aside the order of the Assistant A Commissioner and held that Recovit was correctly classifiable under Chapter Sub-heading 2302.00 as animal feed. The revenue filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) which has been decided by the CEGAT vide its order dated 11.03.1999. The Tribunal has dismissed the appeal of the Department relying upon the decision of a larger Bench of the Tribunal in the B case of Tetragon Chemie (P) ltd. and Ors. v. CCE, Bangalore and Ors., reported in (1999) 82 ECR 98 dated 13.ll.1998. The Tribunal has further held that the contention of the revenue that Recovit is merely a mixture of vitamins alone is not borne out on facts. The Tribunal held that such a product, however, if it contains other things such as anti-oxidants, solvents, stabilisers and used as animal feed will not be classified under Chapter sub- C heading 2936, but will be correctly classified under Tariff heading 23.02. Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the Revenue has come up in appeal. As stated earlier, we are concerned in this appeal in regard to the classification of a product known as Recovit. Now the question is whether animal feed (Recovit) is classifiable under Tariff Heading 29.36 as intermixture D · of vitamins or under Tariff heading 23 .02 as animal feed. We heard Mr. R.Venkataramani, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Mr. Makarand D.Adkar, learned counsel for the respondent. Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant invited our attention E to the show cause notices issued and the orders passed by all the authorities including the Tribunal and submitted that both the Commissioner (Appeals) and the CEGAT have totally ignored the Dy. Chief Chemist's report dated 06.12.1990 in respect of Daily mix, Recovit etc. and that Recovit should be treated as animal feed supplement containing vitamins and minerals. He would F further submit that both the Commissioner (Appeals) and the CEGA T have erred in placing total reliance on the judgment of Tetragon Chemie (P) ltd. (supra). According to the learned senior counsel, the product in that case consists of a mixture of vitamins, minerals and various other ingredients which is not similar to the product 'Recovit' as the same consists of only intennixtures of vitamins and, therefore, it is correctly classifiable under G Chapter Sub-heading 2936.00. Before proceeding further in considering the submission made by learned senior counsel for the appellant, it is better to reproduce both the entries.
The assessee has declared these three products in that classification list E which had been approved by the Assistant Collector. They are :- (a) Daily mix :- ….. . (b) Recovit :- It is a mixture of vitamins but it contains stabilisers and anti-oxidants also, in addition to solvents.
(c) Briplex :- …. According to the assessee, the classification list for these products has already been approved by the Assistant Collector and, therefore, the Assistant Collector is not competent to change his own decision. The assessee had claimed the classification of these products under Chapter sub-heading 2302 G as animal feed supplement and the Department had claimed that the correct classification would be .under Chapter sub-heading 2936 as organic chemicals. It is stated that the product is used as animal feed only and is meant for consumption by animals. It is not fit for human consumption. It basically consists of mixture of vitamins, minerals, anti-oxidants and stabilisers. The Assistant Collector has wrongly classified the product under Chapter 29 as H intermixture of vitamins merely because it consists of solvents, stabilisers C.C.E. v. ABHI CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.LTD. [LAKSHMANAN. l] 215 and anti-oxidants. It was further stated that once powder is meant for use as A an animal feed supplement, it should be classified under Chapter Sub-heading 2302. In our view, the products which have mixture of vitamins and minerals with addition of other ingredients and which are used for animal feed and are not fit for human consumption are to be classified as animal feed supplement under Chapter Heading 2302 and not under Chapter 29.
Learned senior counsel for the Department sought to place reliance upon the report of the Dy. Chief Chemist which has been annexed. It has come on record that the product Recovit basically consists of mixture of vitamins, solvents, anti-oxidants and stabilisers. It has also come on record that Recovit is used as animal feed only and is being consumed by animals C only. It is a finding of fact recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and also by the Tribunal. It may not be out of place to mention that the composition of product was argued before the Tribunal. However, the Department could not contradict or dislodge the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals). Both the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal examined the facts of the case and decided the matter in favour of the assessee. Our attention was invited to the reply affidavit filed by the assessee in this appeal. It is seen that a trade notice No. 34/1990 was issued by the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune whereby it was clarified by the Department that the product having vitamins, stabilisers, anti-oxidants and solvents merits classification under Chapter 29 Heading 29.36 and not B under Heading 23.02 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Apparently based on the above trade notice, a show cause notice was issued which led to the present appeal. Trade notice No. 34 of I 990 reads as follows "OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS,
PUNE PMC'S COMMERCIAL BUILDING, HIRABAUG, TILAK ROAD, PUNE – 2. ********** PUNE CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, COLLECTORA TE TRADE NOTICE NO. 34/1990 (I/Ch. 23/90) Sub :- Central Excise Classification of intermixtures of Vitamins used as animal feed supplements whether classifiable under Heading 23.02 or in Chapter 30 or Chapter 29 – regarding.
c (2005) 2 S.C.R .. A doubt has been raised regarding the correct classification of products which consists of only different vitamins in definite proportions and no other ingredients except the solvents or stabilisers or anti-oxidants. Such products are generally used as animal feed supplements. The doubt raised is whether the such products which· are mixtures of vitamins are classifiable under heading ·23.02 or as medicaments under heading 30.03 or an inter mixture of vitamins under heading 29.36.
The matter has been examined and it is observed that such animal feed supplements which are just inter mixture of vitamins only and that there are no other ingredients except solvents, stabilisers or anti- oxidants are specifically covered under heading 29.36 of C.E.T. as inter mixture of vitamins. Even though they are used as animal feed supplements, they can be classified under heading 23.02 as preparations of kind used in animal feeding, because this is a general heading. Inter mixture of vitamins are specified in so many words in heading 29.36 and accordingly products of the type referred above are correctly classifiable under heading 29.36.
All Trade Associations and Chambers of Commerce and Industries are requested to bring the contents of this Trade Notice to the notice of their member constituents. Hindi version is enclosed.
ATTESTED: SUPERINTENDENT (TECH) C. EX & CUS. PUNE 2 F.No. V.Ch. 23 (8)2/TC/90 Sd/- (L'. Joyaseelan) Additional Collector Central Excise & Customs Pune. Pune, the 30th June, 1990."
Trade Notice No. 34 of 1990 seems to have been issued on the basis of the Board Circular No. l of 1990 dated 01.01.1990. The Central Board of Excise and Customs vide its circular No. 188/22/96-CX dated 26.03.1996 has G clarified that when premix contains in addition to active substances, stabilisers, anti-oxidants etc. and if such preparations are of a kind used in animal feeding the same is classifiable under Heading 23.02. The said circular reads as follows :-
rr C.C.E. v. ABHICHEMICAL& i'HARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. [LAKSHMANAN,J.) 217 "Animal Feed Supplements Circular No. 188/22/96-CX Dated 26/3/96 Subject : Government of India Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise an~ Customs, New Delhi Classification of Animal Feed Supplements under Sub- heading No. 23.02 or 29.36 or Chapter 30 – Instructions- Regarding.
It has been brought to the notice of the Board that a large number of products with supplements'/additives/premixes etc. but are being classified either under heading 23.02 or heading 29.36 or under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff in various Commissionerates. 2. It would be recalled that in its Circular No. l/90 dated 1.1.1990, issued from F .No. I 5/20/89-Cx.l, Board had observed that animal feed supplements which are just inter-mixtures of vitamins only without other ingredients, except solvents, stabilizers or anti-oxidants, cannot c
-be classified under heading 23.02 even though they are used as animal feed supplements. Board had observed that such inter-mixtures of E vitamins are specifically covered under heading 29.36.
3. Trade interests have however represented that animal feed supplements use vitamins, pro-vitamins, amino-acids, anti-biotics, 'Coccidiostats' etc. in very small quantities (micro-quantities) and that the feed supplements contain other organic and in-organic feed F ingredients as well. They have also represented that such micro- nutrients do not have any independent identity as pure chemicals, that they cannot be easily separated into individual pure chemicals : nor do they conform to standard laid down for medicaments. As such, it is claimed that animal feed supplements cannot be classified under G Chapter 29 or Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff merely because they contain the said micro-nutrients.
4. The matter has been further examined by the Board in consultation with the Chief Chemist, Central Revenue Chemical Laboratory (CRCL), New Delhi. c 5. Heading 23.02 of Central Excise Tariff i.e. "preparations of a kind used in animal feeding including dog and cat food" corresponds to Heading 23.09 "Preparations of a kind used in animal feeding" of the HSN. As per Explanatory notes under Heading 23.09 of the HSN, the said heading covers complete animal feeds, supplementary animal feeds and preparations for use in making the complete feeds or supplementary feeds. The preparations for use in making complete feeds or supplementary feeds are known in the trade as "premixes". These preparations are compound composition 'consisting of a number of substances – each type of these substances being present in the ·'premix' in varying propositions to serve a particular purpose. The explanatory notes under Heading 23.09 of HSN (pp, 177-178) further indicate that pre-mixes contain, in. addition to the active substances (vitamins, amino-acid, anti~biotics, coccidiostats etc.) and stabilizers; anti-oxidants etc., certairi organic or in-organic nutritive substances known as carriers which help in homogeneous dispersion and mixing of the active s\Jbstances in the compound feeds to which the preparations referred to in the said explanatory notes are added. 6. In this view of the matter, it would appear that preparations containing the active substances (vitamins or provitamins, amino- acid, antibiotics, coccidiostats etc.) along withthe said carriers would fall under Heading 23.02 of the CET provided such preparation are of a kind used in animal feeding. It may however be fiOted that Heading 23.098 of the HSN excludes products of Chapter 29 and medicaments of Heading 30.03 or 30.04. Hence, while deciding the classification of the products claimed to be animal feed supplements are ordinarily of commonly known to the trade as products for a specific use in animal feeding.
7. In view of the foregoing discussions, the classification of each product being claimed as animal feed supplements may be decided on merits in the light of the above and in accordance with the explanatory. notes to Heading 23 .09 or the HSN read with Chapter Note 1 of Chapter 23 · of the CET.
8. Board's Circular No.1/90 dated 1. l.1990 stands modified to the extent indicMed above. F.No. 23/1/94-CX.1 Sd/- (S.C. Bhatia) Under Secretary to the Govt. of India" t'' ' … C.C.E. 1•. ABHI CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.LTD. [LAKSHMANAN, J.] 2 J 9 It may be extremely relevant to point out that the Board's Circular No. A I of 1990 dated 01.01.1990 stands modified accordingly. Similarly, the Dy. Director General of Foreign Trade vide its policy Circular No. 44 (RE 99/ 1997-2002 dated 25.11.1999 has re-confirmed that if such pre-mixes are for use exclusively for animal feed as supplements, the same continued to be classified under Heading 23.09 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Policy circular B No. 44 runs as follows :-
"POLICY CIRCULAR No.44(RE-99)/ 1997-2002 Dated 25th November, 1999 Attention is invited to Policy Circular No. 22(RE-99)/1997-2002 dated 27.7.99, C regarding classification of animal feed supplements.
In this regard it is further clarified that 'Pre-mixes' containing vitamins or pro-vitamins, aminoacids, coccidiostats etc. for use exclusively in animal feed as supplements continue to be classified under the Heading 23.09, as per Explanatory Notes to Harmonized Commodity Description and coding system. D This issues with the approval of DGFT.
Sd/- (0.P. Hisaria) Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade F.No.01/89/180/00072/AM99/PC I-A Dated 25th November, 1999 Issued by : Ministry of Commerce Directorate General of Foreign Trade
New Delhi." It may also be relevant to point out that on 27.09.1990, the Central Excise Department has drawn a sample of the product Recovit and the same was sent for chemical analysis to the Deputy Chief Chemist at Mumbai. While drawing the sample, a test memo was prepared by the Inspector under F. No. BR 11/CL/Abhi/90 dated 27.09.1990. It can be seen from the said test G memo that the said product Recovit had in addition to the intermixture of vitamins other ingredients such as anti-oxidants, solvents and stabilisers and that the product prepared cannot, therefore, be called as only intennixture of vitamins.
The said test memo reads as follows :- "OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BHOSARI RANGE II;-• BHOSARl, PUNE 411 039 TEST MEMO F.No.BR 11/CL/ABHl/90/ Bhosari, the 27.09.1990
The Deputy Chief Chemist, Central Excise Laboratory, Estrella Batteries Compound, Dharawi Road, Matunga, BOMBAY – 400 019. c Dear Sir; A sample ofRecovit has been·~ent by hand delivery dated 27.09.90 for test.
I. Name of the factory & address : Abbi Chemical & Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.T36-38, MIDC, Bhosari, Pune-26. 2. Description of sample : Animal Feed Supplement – Recovit. 3. Identification mark, if any
~Batch No. 338-A. 4. Date of Drawal and Batch No. :27-9-90 Batch No. 338-A 5. No. of containers :4 Nos. r 6. Quantity : 100 ml. …….. F 7. The sample is to be tested for : The party has classified this product
under Chapter Heading 2302.00 . . The classification may please be confirmed. 8. Other information (i) Chemical nature & %age of : As per separate sheet attached. ingredients in the product
(ii) Brief outline of manufacturing ·:As per separate sheet attached. Process (iii) Mode of its application : Animal feed supplement C.C.E. r. ABHI CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. (LAKSHMANAJ{ J.). 22 J . (and use)
(iv) Any printed literature _if Available may be sent. Label enclosed. Sd/-. For Abhi Chemical & Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. Inspector of Central Excise Sd/-· · Bhosari Range II, Bhosari
(Authorised signatory) PUNE-39 DECLARATION Four representative samples of Recovit at Abhi Chemical & · Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. have been drawn by the Inspector of Central C Excise, Bhosari Range II, Bhosari, Pune-411039 and these have been sealed in our presence. One of the sealed samples have been given to · us. We are perfectly satisfied with the manner of sampling. For Abhi Chemical & Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.
Sd/- (Authorised signatory)" "CHEMICAL NATURE AND PERCENTAGE INGREDIENTS IN RECOVIT AS FOLLOWS : OF S.No. Name of ingredients Chemical nature % in product . I. Tween – 80 (Polysorbate) · . Brownish yellow oily liquid 34.97%
2. Bulytated Hydroxy Anisol · Crystalline powder 0.02% 3. Bulytated Hydroxy Toulene Crystalline powder ·0.02% 4. Vitamin A Palmitate . Yellow oily substance 2.57% 5. Vitamin B3 White powder ·
. 0.01% 6. Vitamin B 12 Red orange powder 0.0026% 7. Vitamin E Aceiate · Pale yellow golden · . 4;37% Viscuss liquid · 8. Glycerine· Colourles_s viscuss liquid 26.85% 9. Sodium Ascorbate
White crystalline powder 9.62% IO. Gracia! Acetic Acid Colourless liquid 0.34% [2005) 2 S.C.R. II. Water 21.23% c OUTLINE OF MANUFACTURING PROCESS Step I. Step 2. Step 3. Step 4 .
Mix Vit A, Vit E, Vit D3, BHA & BHT completely in vessel. Warm T~een • 80 upto 40 degree C and add to it mixture No. I_ in a thin stream. Stirr it well. Add Glycerine in a think stream with stirring in 2.
. Take 60. Ltrs water_ (D'mineralised) add to it Sodium Asco~bate dissolve it completely adjust FH to 6.0 with Glacial Acetic Acid add this soln. _To main soln. Stir for 15 minutes. And filter then add vit Bl2 (Prepare with small qty. ofD.M: water and add to main soln.) Product Is kept over night &
ready for filling, For Abhi Chemical & Pharmaceutical Pvt Ltd. Sd/- (J\'uthorised signatory)" • · ,· The order passed by_the larger_Bench of the CEGAT_dated 13.11.1998 was also placed before us. We have gone through the same and we approve . the classlfi~tion laid d~w~ by ihe CEGAT in ;eg,.;ci to the s~bject-matt~~ of E controversy and the principles laid down therein. In fact, the said order of the• larger bench was challenged before this Court. This Court in Collector of Central F.xcise, Bangalore v. Tetragon Chemie P. Ltd, reported in (200 I) 132 E.L.T. 525 (Three-Judge Bench) ~pheld the view taken by the Tribu·nal that the products in question are animal feed_ supplements_ and that_ the animal F feed supplements were rightly included in Tariff Item 23.02 being preparation of a kind used in animal feeding including dogs and cats food. The Bench has agreed with the conclusion of the Tribunal that even food supplements . like the products of the respondents therein which are used in animals feeding would fall under Heading 23.02. This Court while affirming the decision of . the Tribunal dismissed the civil appeals.
f 'G For the foregoing reasons, we are of the opinion.that the contentions in the civil appeal are apparently contrary to the stand taken by the Department in the circulars mentioned supra and we, therefore, have no hesitation in dismissing the appeal as bereft of ~ny merits. Howe~er, we s_ay no costs. H S.K.S.
Appeals dismissed.